arrow-circle-downarrow-circle-rightarrow-leftarrow-rightcheckchevron-downPathPathclosefilterminuspausepeoplepinplayplusportalsearchsocial-facebooksocial-instagramsocial-linkedinsocial-tiktoksocial-twittersocial-youtube
Insights

Balancing tax, asset protection and ownership from day one

The way a business is structured determines how value is created, protected and shared. This piece unpacks the key decisions that shape outcomes long after day one.

Balancing tax, asset protection and ownership from day one

The most common mistake we see when clients are setting up a new business is that they focus on the entity before considering the outcome.

When setting up a new business or investment vehicle, the real focus should be on how the structure will perform across three critical areas: tax effectiveness, asset protection, and ownership alignment. These decisions don’t sit in isolation, they need to work alongside everything else a client has going on, whether that’s existing investments, property holdings, or other entities within a broader group.

From our experience, the most effective business structures are those designed with this wider context in mind. Getting the balance right early ensures the structure supports not just how the business starts, but how it operates, manages risk, and evolves over time.

Tax effectiveness needs to work across the whole group

Tax is often the starting point when structuring a business, but it’s rarely as simple as choosing the lowest rate.

The structure needs to provide flexibility in how income is generated, distributed and ultimately taxed over time. That includes understanding how the new entity interacts with existing structures, whether profits can be allocated efficiently, and how future changes in ownership or strategy may affect the overall tax position.

A structure that looks efficient on day one can quickly become restrictive if it doesn’t allow for that flexibility. This is particularly relevant for clients with multiple entities, investments or income streams, where the effectiveness of the structure depends on how everything fits together, not just how one entity is taxed.

Asset protection extends beyond the business itself

For many business owners, a new venture introduces risk into an already established financial position.

“A big part of what we’re doing is making sure the risk from one venture doesn’t spill over into others the client has going on,” says Alex.

We regularly see clients with property holdings, development projects or other businesses operating alongside a new venture. In these cases, structure becomes a key tool for isolating risk and protecting those existing assets.

The way entities are separated, or connected, determines where risk sits. Without the right structure, liabilities from the business can extend beyond it, exposing personal assets or unrelated investments. This is particularly important in industries where contractual exposure, borrowing, or operational risk is higher.

Structuring a business with asset protection in mind ensures that growth in one area of the group does not unintentionally put other areas at risk.

Shareholder alignment should be built in from the start

As soon as a business has multiple owners, structure needs to reflect more than just ownership percentages. “You need to think about the people involved early, once you’ve got multiple shareholders, you’re really structuring around how those relationships will work over time,” explains Alex.

Different shareholders will often have different objectives, whether that’s income versus capital growth, varying risk appetites, or different time horizons. A well-considered structure accommodates these differences while maintaining clarity around control and decision-making.

This is where shareholder agreements become critical.

Putting the right framework in place from the beginning defines how decisions are made, how profits are shared, and how disputes are resolved if they arise. It also deals with scenarios such as one shareholder exiting, bringing in new investors, or changes in involvement over time.

In our experience, the absence of this structure doesn’t create problems immediately, but it significantly increases the likelihood of issues as the business matures.

Structure needs to reflect how the business will actually operate

The technical structure is only one part of the equation, it also needs to align with how the business will function in practice.

That includes how the business engages with lenders, suppliers and customers, how funding is introduced, and how profits are reinvested or distributed. It also needs to support the level of governance required as the business grows and potentially introduces new stakeholders.

Our role as advisers is to ensure these practical considerations are built into the structure from the outset, rather than addressed reactively later. This means designing something that is fit for purpose not just at start-up, but through periods of growth, change and increasing complexity.

Alex, and his business advisory team in Adelaide, are consistently providing the viewpoint to clients: “You don’t feel a poor structure on day one, everything still works. It’s only later, when there’s money on the table or risk in the business, that the limitations show up. And by then, you’re not making a clean change, you’re working around something that’s already been built.” 


Related insights

Unlock growth and resilience with PKF’s business advisory experts

PKF's business advisers help businesses navigate challenges, optimise performance, and plan for the future. 

Read our latest case study to see how our advisory team delivered measurable impact for a client like you.

BAS trailer 3

Subscribe to our newsletter

Subscribe

Propel your career

Learn more about Careers

Follow us

Find your closest office

Locations

Risk or quality concerns

Email

About the firm

Transparency reports