Insights
Over recent months crypto has become more and more talked about; whether it’s Elon Musk tweeting and causing the price of Bitcoin to spike or crash by 25% (1), Mark Cuban accepting crypto for tickets to Dallas Mavericks games (1), or Tom Brady wanting to be paid part of his Buccaneers salary in crypto (2), it seems to be everywhere.
It is estimated that nearly 1 in 5 Australian adults now own some form of crypto (3), with the total value of their holdings adding up to $8 billion. This then begs the question: What are the tax consequences of dealing in Crypto?
The Right Structure
Prior to entering any new business venture or investment, weighing up the appropriate structure based on your personal circumstances is critical.
Ideally, determining whether to operate as a sole trader, through a trust or a company is done so prior to investing, however, if you are like most investors who have jumped into crypto, you have likely done so in your own name. Whilst this ‘structure’ may not be ideal, it certainly does not mean it is ‘set in stone’. We have recently assisted numerous individuals restructure their crypto and digital asset holdings into other more tax efficient structures whilst also incorporating asset protection strategies.
Tax Consequences
Over recent years, the number and type of transactions that can be undertaken in the crypto space has increased dramatically. Some transactions you might (or might not) be familiar with are:
- Crypto-to-crypto (selling one cryptocurrency to acquire another cryptocurrency)
- Mining
- Staking
- Airdrops
- Yield Farming through Decentralised Finance (DeFi) applications
- Crypto savings accounts
- Buying and selling NFTs
- Receiving crypto as a form of payment in your business.
Each of the above transactions can have different tax consequences and it is important you are aware of these, as the ATO is increasingly scrutinising taxpayers dealing in crypto.
If you would like to discuss setting up the right structure, restructuring existing crypto portfolios and other digital assets, or are wanting to understand the tax consequences of transactions you may already be conducting, please get in touch with us.
12 Nov 2021
Author
Shane Mays
Partner
Melbourne
Related insights
Insights
Pillar Two Has Arrived: Far More Than Another Reporting RequirementInternational tax reform has accelerated in recent years, but only a small number of initiatives have materially reshaped how multinational groups are governed, structured, and managed. Pillar Two is one of them.Developed in response to concerns around base erosion and profit...
2 contributors
Melbourne
Insights
The unanimous New South Wales Court of Appeal decision in the Uber payroll tax case marks a turning point for Australia’s gig economy and platform-based businesses. The Court ruled that payments to Uber drivers are “wages” under the Payroll Tax Act, overturning the previous decision in Uber’s favour. This serves as a warning to all businesses using contractor and centralised payment models to urgently reassess payroll tax risks. Industries such as healthcare, education, finance, insurance, and domestic services must review and adapt their business structures to ensure compliance with evolving payroll tax obligations.
Ryan Lu
Partner
Melbourne
Insights
On 20 August 2025, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released PCG 2025/2, providing its final compliance approach to restructures undertaken in response to restructures, the new thin capitalisation rules and debt deduction creation rules (DDCR) introduced by the Treasury Laws Amendment (Making Multinationals Pay Their Fair Share—Integrity and Transparency) Act 2024. This guideline offers a risk assessment framework and practical examples to help taxpayers self-assess the compliance risk of their restructuring arrangements.
Becky Nguyen
Partner
Melbourne